Upon question, Mr. Peterson said this site is vested for 5 units per acre. He said in
2008 there was a Comprehensive Plan amendment to expand the utility enclave area
to include this parcel, and a Land Development Code text amendment adopted in
2009, and a Planned Development (PD) that was adopted. He said they are not
building out to the same intensity of the PD they are going less. He said the
entitlements under the previous PD allowed them to have townhouses, they are not
opting for that and he said the current request is for single-family detached lots 50-75
feet wide. He said they do not need to come to the Board for approval to build the 423
homes.
Chair Braswell said there is going to be 423 homes built regardless of what this Board
decides. He said the CDD today is to approve a funding mechanism to do that and if
we do not approve it they will go somewhere else and borrow money.
Upon question, Mr. Peterson said the site plan was approved by the Board in 2009. He
said the residential and mixed used projects once adopted are good for their entirety of
the build out. He said the developer owns more of Grenelefe and has the intent to
develop that further. He said the land uses were not consistent with their petition and
they scaled it back to be consistent. He said a less intensive use can always be scaled
back; he said it is in the Land Development Code under the minor modification criteria.
He said if they want to increase the density or the land area that would prompt it to
come back in for review. He said our standards today are better and they will have to
have open space, sidewalks, recreation amenities, stormwater retention ponds, and the
25 foot setbacks for garages. He said when the infrastructure in the development is
under the CDD then improvements and maintenance fall under the taxpayers that the
CDD funds and not upon the general fund. He said the CDD is close to being a city and
the police powers fall short of that which a city would have. He said the members of the
CDD Board members will be elected.
Chair Braswell said he knows that CDDs are property taxes for the rest of their life.
Commissioner Lindsey said it is a payoff and they have the right to pay it off early. He
said it has a sunset and any CDD language has to be in all caps and bold type on any
contract.
Upon question, Mr. Peterson said the land use has already been approved and will not
come back to the Board unless there is an increase. He said if they wanted to do
multi-family they would have to come in for a land use amendment. He said the
single-family is what was approved.
The Chair opened a public hearing.
Jere Earlywine, representing the applicant, said they have established all six of the
criteria to establish the CDD. He said the project is already approved and moving
forward and the question is whether you have the HOA or the CDD manage this. He
said it allows them to bring forward less expensive infrastructure. He said the residents
can go back, refurbish the stormwater ponds and they can access the tax exempt bond
market. He said it is a much more robust operations and maintenance entity. He said